Article
Publication Date
November 2013
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Terrorism and Political Violence
Volume
25
Issue
5
Abstract
In recent years, a growing body of research has set out to examine the role that emotions play in shaping political attitudes and behaviors regarding terrorism. However, one major issue that is generally overlooked is whether the thematic relevance of emotive triggers leads to differential effects on people's reactions to international terrorism. Specifically, does anger—regardless of its source—tend to drive people towards supporting an aggressive foreign policy option to counter terrorism, or do the thematic underpinnings of anger (i.e., the specific contents that trigger this particular emotion, such as watching a news story about a recent terrorist attack) matter vis-à-vis the policy choice? To address this gap, this study experimentally examines the impact of anger—induced by thematically relevant versus irrelevant emotive triggers—on people's cognitive processing and foreign policy preferences regarding international terrorism. Overall, we find that the induction of anger via thematically relevant emotive triggers leads to a higher tendency for selecting a military option, a lower amount of information acquisition, and a shorter processing time in response to terror-related incidents.
First Page
709
Last Page
733
Included in
Cognition and Perception Commons, Cognitive Psychology Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, Models and Methods Commons, Personality and Social Contexts Commons, Social Psychology Commons
Publisher Statement
Copyright © Taylor & Francis and Informa UK Limited, an Informa Group Company. Link: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09546553.2012.692739#preview