Publication Date
3-2015
Abstract
Many physical theories accurately predict which events are possible and which are not, or -- in situations where probabilistic (e.g., quantum) effects are important -- predict the probabilities of different possible outcomes. At first glance, it may seem that this probabilistic information is all we need. We show, however, that to adequately describe physicists' reasoning, it is important to also take into account additional knowledge -- about what is possible and what is not. We show that this knowledge can be described in terms of possibility theory, and that the presence of this knowledge makes many problems algorithmically decidable.
Original file
Comments
Technical Report: UTEP-CS-15-13a
To appear in Proceedings of the World Congress of the International Fuzzy Systems Association IFSA'2015, joint with the Annual Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology EUSFLAT'2015, Gijon, Asturias, Spain, June 30 - July 3, 2015.